Walters: The Rise of Mississippi’s Socialist Republicans

Senator Chris McDaniel one of only a handful to stand against the growing corporatist welfare state.

By Ryan S. Walters | @ryanswalters73

The Republican Party is supposed to advocate conservatism. That’s kinda what our party has stood for since the long-gone days of Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge. But now, sadly, very few Republicans are actually true conservatives, standing up for the traditions of limited government, free markets, low taxes, sound money, and reduced regulations.occupy wallstreet--socialism doesn't work.preview

The recent passage of a massive half a billion dollar economic development package in the Mississippi Legislature proves, as if we didn’t have enough evidence already, that the party no longer hold to those timeless principles. It is now a Party of Corporate Socialism. The battle in the party is now one between the ideas of Karl Marx and the philosophy of Adam Smith, between Tate Reeves and Chris McDaniel, between a government-driven economy and one built upon economic freedom.

Wyatt Emmerich wrote a great column last week, a piece entitled “Mississippi’s Version of Socialism”: “When the government picks which industries come to Mississippi, you can’t get more socialistic than that.” Indeed, as Emmerich points out, “Mississippi is in the top 10 in company-specific subsidies per capita. A few years ago, Mississippi was number two.” But after two decades of “bribing companies to come to Mississippi, how’s it looking? With the third highest unemployment rate in the nation, not very good. That’s a typical lousy result for socialistic economic policies.”

Though Socialism may be defined, at least officially, as government ownership of the means of production, there are other aspects of it to help achieve that goal – economic central planning, re-distribution of wealth, and, in the words of Kevin D. Williamson, “using political agencies to provide goods and services that otherwise would be provided privately in the marketplace.”

And it’s these last two agenda items that ensnare the current Republican Party in Mississippi. When we think of re-distributing wealth, we tend to think of it in terms of taxing the rich and giving it to the poor, and that’s certainly a lot of what Socialism entails but not Mississippi’s version. The Magnolia State is now re-distributing wealth from the pockets of the taxpayers to the wallets of large multi-billion dollar corporations.

As to the package in question, the legislature voted, with just six dissenting votes in both chambers, to award hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to build a shipyard in Gulfport and for Continental Tire to construct a plant in Hinds County, the latter being a 145-year-old company with more than $42.5 billion in sales per year and 208,000 employees that will now be receiving a huge “investment” from the taxpayers of Mississippi, all paid for in full by the state’s credit card.

As the leader of the opposition, what little could be mustered, Senator McDaniel has taken a beating of sorts by the Establishment elite in the media, though not among the rank-and-file across the state, who are supporting his position by a 20-to-1 margin.

To the press he gave his reasoning for opposing the package:

Corporate welfare, as a general rule, should concern us as Mississippians. With so many small businesses in Mississippi suffering, why can we justify or how can we justify spending hundreds of millions of dollars for a Fortune 500 company, essentially, from Germany that has $42.5 billion in sales each year?

The best way to grow an economy is to make sure that corporations are unhindered by obstacles. That is, things like the franchise tax, things like corporate income tax, things like the inventory tax. Why don’t we remove those obstacles for all businesses? That way, our economy is hospitable to all businesses. What the studies have shown, these larger companies, and even smaller ones, gravitate toward states with no corporate income tax. Why not take that approach instead of singling out a company, spending hundreds of millions of dollars and hoping that everything works out in the future? They tell us that we don’t have enough money for state retirement. They tell us we don’t have enough money for teachers. They tell us we don’t have enough money for highways and bridges and our roads, but we had enough money to give hundreds of millions of dollars to a big company in Germany. That gave me some heartburn.

And it should have given many more in the legislature heartburn too, but sadly many of them fell right into line behind the Establishment leadership.

So, let’s look at some key facts on the economic development package and see what we got for our money:

First, Senator McDaniel had major concerns with the secrecy behind the deal. He didn’t receive a copy of the 200-page bill until the morning of the vote. It would have been reckless to support the bill without time to read and research it. In fact, the whole deal from birth to final passage took all of five hours.

Second, not only did the numbers not seem fair to the taxpayers, the corporate welfare aspect of the legislation caused great concern. Instead of handouts to billion dollar corporations, Mississippi should assist its small business owners by creating a free and fair environment – Adam Smith’s free market – which allows for economic growth. As McDaniel said, eliminating the inventory tax, franchise tax and corporate income tax would be a good start.

Third, the clawback provisions, which are the built-in mechanisms that could allow the state to re-coup its money if the deal’s job-creation goals are not met, are not practical, and perhaps even unworkable.

Fourth, Mississippi’s bond indebtedness – that is, our debt – presently exceeds $4 billion. The state has increased that debt by $1.5 billion since Haley Barbour became Governor in 2004. That’s how much the state currently owes, and it’s quickly worsening.

But how much is it really? Well, just servicing the state’s debt costs the taxpayers more than $450,000,000 each year – more than enough to fully fund education (x2), or stabilize PERS, or maintain our roads and bridges, which we currently have a gasoline tax for.

In response to the vote, Mississippi State Director for the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Russ Latino, shared the following facts:

  1. The state is authorizing $243 million in bonds for a tire manufacturer to be located near Clinton. Hinds County is authorizing another $20 million in bonds. In addition to the $263 million in bonds, this company will be virtually tax exempt (not just property and income taxes). Senator Hob Bryan seemed to have some numbers to suggest that the total value to this company is half a BILLION DOLLARS.
  1. This tire company, in turn, must hire at least 500 people by 2020 and is supposed to hire another 2000 by 2028.
  1. If the company does not live up to the hiring goals, the state MAY (not shall) recoup all or a “partial” amount of the money disbursed by virtue of a guarantee from the parent company. The state may also retake the 5 million square foot facility.
  1. $11 million in bonds are being given to a Coast company, presumably to allow us to hit a HUD requirement stemming from Katrina money. This at least appears to be for infrastructure. Why these two projects were combined is beyond me.
  1. The State’s revenue projections for these projects is based on voodoo economics. Basically, for their numbers to work you have to assume that all of the people who will be hired by these companies are presently unemployed Mississippians. The State also could not answer the question of how much revenue would be lost by giving all these special tax breaks or whether other projects had lived up to their initial projections.
  1. With the exception of the chairmen who had to present the 200-page bill, no one in the chambers had received a copy until this morning. In the case of Chairman Fillingane, he indicated he’d received it 3 days ago.

So what’s the difference between this terrible deal and anything the Democrats do? It was cloaked in secrecy (like Obamacare), unveiled with hardly enough time to read it, much less study it to any degree, and it awarded millions to huge corporations. We expect such from the liberals in government, not from so-called conservatives.

And these deals never, ever pan out. Writes Russ Latino, “In Mississippi alone, there have been costly failures (Beef Plant, $55 million; Kior, $75 million; Twin Creeks, $26 million), projects that have not come close to satisfying job projections (Stion, the port expansion) and companies that have left after incentives have run (Oreck). The current crop of projects may not bear the same risks, but they are not risk free. On a practical level, it would seem no one is really asking the question ‘how much is too much for a taxpayer sponsored job?’”

As Emmerich pointed out, even if the job projections did manage to pan out, which they almost never do, it would add up to $300,000 in taxpayer subsidies per job! Twenty-five years ago, he writes, “Mississippi’s unemployment rate was consistently two percentage points better than the national average” but now “it’s two percentage points worse. So after two decades of company subsidies, Mississippi has increased its unemployment by four percentage points. That’s 52,000 lost jobs – at least five times as many jobs lost than jobs gained by all these subsidies.”

Senator McDaniel once again showed that he will stand on the principles of conservatism, the very principles that have proven to work time and again, and will stand no matter the issue or the pie-in-the-sky promises behind it.

To those who say Senator McDaniel is anti-business in his vote, consider that he has been a BIPEC Business Champion for 8 Consecutive Years, has a perfect 100% score with the NFIB, and has authored and co-authored several pro-business bills, including inventory tax reduction and franchise tax elimination.

And at the end of the day Senator McDaniel will be proven right when this aid package, along with all the others, never achieves the great assurances we have been given by politicians who know nothing of job creation or free market economics.

Hopefully one day soon the Republican Party in Mississippi, and in Washington, will return to a party of free markets and capitalism, of the ideas of Adam Smith, and not of Karl Marx. Only then will we finally achieve true economic growth and prosperity for all our people, just as we did in the by-gone days of Harding and Coolidge. Or, if not, we run the risk of Socialism’s end game, which is, in the words of Margaret Thatcher, running out of our money.



  1. As I have previously stated, “crony capitalism” has been a fact of life since the days of Adam Smith. Ryan knows this. Government has been picking winners and losers in the business sector beginning with tax incentives–corporate taxes, income taxes, property & ad valorem taxes, capital gains taxes, etc. Businesses are in the business to make money, earn capital, and achieve value–not for the sake of the good citizens of Mississippi–but for their shareholders. Therefore, we should not fault the system of “crony capitalism” per se. Rather, it is the responsibility of ALL of our elected Legislative representatives and the Governor to take an active and informed role in making such important decisions. Can you imagine the hue and cry that would arise from the Governor’s office if Speaker Gunn were to work out such a generous deal to a private entity, and then give the Governor only 5 hours to review such a complicated deal? The Governor would object, and with good reason. Even the Democrats in Wahington don’t operate this way. Notwithstanding all of the objections of Obamacare, Congress was provided a sufficient time period to hold hearings and to break the bill down so that OUR representatives could make informed decisions on how to vote. If a potential business opportunity is so fragile, that by allowing legislators to perform their constitutional duty, then one must question whether the deal is actually in the best interests of the State and the people who sovereign under our State Constitution.

  2. This piece deserves to be included in a college rhetoric textbook as an example of overwrought, overheated, simplistic argument. We have on the one side, Socialism, Karl Marx, Tate Reeves (and we should add Phil Bryant, Philip Gunn, and all but 3 members of the House and all but three members of the Senate – the socialists include Michael Watson and Angela Hill). On the other side we have Capitalism. Adam Smith, Chris McDaniel, two other members of the Senate and three members of the House. There are only six, led by the prophet McDaniel who have not bowed the knee to the god of Socialism. All the rest have apostasised.

    It is worth noting that by lines drawn here both Mrs. Thatcher and Ronald Reagan would fall on the side of Marx and the Socialists. Include among them also all the Republican governors and legislators of the southern states who also engage in economic development and who, I am sure, would be happy to wash Mississippi’s hands of the impurity of socialism by taking these two projects.

    The lamented Justice Scalia said, “I am an textualist. I am an originalist. ButI am not a nut.” I am afraid this piece of rhetoric represents the one thing Scalia said he was not.

  3. Cro-mudgeon Man, you are so cynical. Why can’t you ever cut The Messiah some slack? So he wants to eliminate all forms of Corporate Socialism? What is wrong with that–especially since the sovereign people of Mississippi will get left holding the bag if the tire deal fizzles out? As a Prophet, perhaps he knows something that Phil and Tater-Tot don’t know.

  4. Seems to me that the taxpayer is always the one left holding the bag while our leaders are patting each other on the back and telling us what is best for us when they venture off into investments that leave us millions and billions and trillions in debt. Well, it’s not their money so i can see where they actually may not be so concerned with the outcome of their so called investment. Anybody want to buy an old beef company?

  5. Robert Porter says:

    Boy, you tell like it is. I believed we lost our rears on that one. But guess what the leaders that be have forgotten about that and moved on to the other pocket. Not that I expect any of the companies involved to go broke, but one never knows. I believe we need to make all this info available to to read before they vote, and no night deals made in smoke filled rooms. That is what got Mr. McDaniel defeated. Things need to change and they need to change in hurry.

  6. Hyp O. Kritt says:

    Wow, purity has finally dawned in the life of his majesty McDaniel. Problem is you won’t talk about all the projects he voted for in the past. What about it Ryan? Kior, Stion and Kemper to name a few. What a short memory you have. Ok, let’s hear the spin in 3.2.1…

  7. OneSmartDude says:

    Clearly we have a lot of folks who a. never took economics or b. failed miserably. Thatcher and Reagan would not approve nor anyone with any sense of economics. But you’re certainly entitled to your illiterate opinion.

  8. OneSmartDude says:

    Your article is spot on!

  9. Steve Stanford says:

    It is right and proper to debate if incentives to get large businesses to locate in a state go too far, or to even cast the “corporate welfare” argument, but I would point out the need to be both careful and causious in using the term “Socialist” to paint ALL so broadly since doing so, even for “effect” in a headline, reduces, dilutes and morphs the political, social, economic and philisophical realities and threats of socialism – which will only impact it’s true application over time and potentially render the term useless in the face of true, serious and bonified socialistic threats. “The Rise of Socialist Repulicans?” Come on now….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: