John Boehner the Hypocrite

Last week on his radio show, Mark Levin read a very interesting newspaper column from November 2010 .  It was a piece entitled “What the Next Speaker Must Do,” authored by Republican Houseboehner minority leader John Boehner and published in the Wall Street Journal just days after the midterms that propelled the GOP into control of the House.  We have posted it in its entirety here for all of our readers to see and digest.  As you read it, think about Boehner and his tactics the last four years.  Think about his great display last week on the House floor, railing against Obama’s executive amnesty, then his promise to bring a clean bill to the floor that fully funds DHS, which administers the immigration service.  He’s a typical hypocrite!  But who in the GOP Establishment isn’t?

What the Next Speaker Must Do” by John Boehner, Wall Street Journal, November 5, 2010:

I grew up in a small house on a hill in Cincinnati, Ohio, with 11 brothers and sisters. My dad ran a bar, Andy’s Café, that my grandfather Andrew Boehner opened in 1938. We didn’t have much but were thankful for what we had. And we didn’t think much about Washington.

That changed when I got involved with a small business, which I eventually built into a successful enterprise. I saw firsthand how government throws obstacles in the way of job-creation and stifles our prosperity. It prompted me to get involved in my government, and eventually took me to Congress.

Millions of Americans have had a similar experience. They look at Washington and see an arrogance of power. They see a Congress that doesn’t listen, that is ruled by leaders who seem out of touch and dismissive, even disdainful, of the anger that Americans feel toward their government and the challenges they face in an economy struggling to create jobs.

The political landscape has been permanently reshaped over the past two years. Overreaching by elected officials—in the form of pork-laden “stimulus” spending, permanent bailouts, and policies that force responsible taxpayers to subsidize irresponsible behavior—has awakened something deep in our national character. This has led to a surge of activism by citizens demanding smaller, more accountable government and a repudiation of Washington in Tuesday’s elections.

Tired of politicians who refuse to listen, Americans who previously were not involved or minimally involved in the political process are now helping to drive it. While their backgrounds are as diverse as the country itself, their message to Washington is the same: Government leaders are servants of the people; the people are not servants of their government.

The members of the 112th Congress must heed this message if there is to be any hope of repairing the shattered bonds of trust between the American people and their elected leaders. And that begins with the speaker of the House, who as leader of the institution must lead by example.

Accordingly, there are several steps I believe the next speaker should be prepared to take immediately. Among them:

• No earmarks. Earmarks have become a symbol of a broken Washington, and an entire lobbying industry has been created around them. The speaker of the House shouldn’t use the power of the office to raid the federal Treasury for pork-barrel projects. To the contrary, the speaker should be an advocate for ending the current earmark process, and should adhere to a personal no-earmarks policy that stands as an example for all members of Congress to follow.

I have maintained a no-earmarks policy throughout my time of service in Congress. I believe the House must adopt a moratorium on all earmarks as a signal of our commitment to ending business as usual in the spending process.

• Let Americans read bills before they are brought to a vote. The speaker of the House should not allow any bill to come to a vote that has not been posted publicly online for at least three days. Members of Congress and the American people must have the opportunity to read it.

Similarly, the speaker should insist that every bill include a clause citing where in the Constitution Congress is given the power to pass it. Bills that can’t pass this test shouldn’t get a vote. House Republicans’ new governing agenda, “A Pledge to America,” calls for the speaker to implement such reforms immediately.

• No more “comprehensive” bills. The next speaker should put an end to so-called comprehensive bills with thousands of pages of legislative text that make it easy to hide spending projects and job-killing policies. President Obama’s massive “stimulus” and health-care bills, written behind closed doors with minimal public scrutiny, were the last straw for many Americans. The American people are not well-served by “comprehensive,” and they are rightly suspicious of the adjective.

• No more bills written behind closed doors in the speaker’s office. Bills should be written by legislators in committee in plain public view. Issues should be advanced one at a time, and the speaker should place an emphasis on smaller, more focused legislation that is properly scrutinized, constitutionally sound, and consistent with Americans’ demand for a less-costly, less-intrusive government.

The speaker of the House, like all members of Congress, is a servant of the American people. The individual entrusted with that high honor and responsibility should act accordingly. A speaker’s mission should not be to consolidate power in the speaker’s office, but rather to ensure that elected officials uphold their oath to defend the Constitution and the American people we serve. If a speaker carries out that mission successfully, the result should be legislation that better reflects the considerable challenges we face as a nation.

The American people deserve a majority in Congress that listens to the people, focuses on their priorities and honors their demands for smaller, more accountable government. Accountability starts at the top, in the office of the speaker.



  1. P Tom Young says:

    What the hell happened to the guy that wrote that? Has he been replaced by his evil twin?

  2. Anonymous says:

    Hey Guys: To be sure, Mr. Boehner is a rank opportunist. When he wrote that column, The Tea Party Patriots had just stunned the nation a few days before in the congressional elections. Republicans were now going to be a majority in the House, and they had even gained some seats in the Senate. Therefore, he was simply pandering to the Tea Party Patriots in an attempt to exert the Establishment’s leverage over them. The Establishment thought that they could placate the Tea Party Patriots with supportive sound bites. In doing so, Mr. Boehner and many others made a serious miscalculation as to the long-term commitment of the Tea Party movement and its members. By reaching out as he did, Mr. Boehner caused many in the Tea Party movement to believe that the Republican Party was desperate for their support and input. This has given them a highly inflated self image, notwithstanding the fact that many of them are merely the lint that clings to the fringe that surrounds the base of the Republican Party–especially when it comes to elections for statewide office. The fact that Mr. Boehner did not follow through with his suggestions was seen by the Tea Party folks as further proof that he and the rest of the Washington GOP Establishment cannot be trusted to keep their word to hold fast to conservative positions.
    David Frazier

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: