Some Thoughts on Chris McDaniel’s Thorough Investigation

Since the release of all of the evidence gathered in the disputed Senate runoff, there’s been some confusion and even ridicule of the inclusion of McDaniel attorney Mitch Tyner irregular vote.

As I scanned the Internet over the past week, I saw several national stories that mocked the McDaniel camp for contesting the vote of their own lawyer. And sadly this same sort of silly rhetoric has come from some of McDaniel’s very own supporters, who apparently have not thought the matter through.

Chris McDaniel is a man of integrity and is eager to get to the bottom of the voting fraud and irregularities, regardless of where the votes came from or who cast them. Any vote that has any questions about it whatsoever needs to be questioned.

This is particularly true in the case of absentee ballots. State law governs the preciseness of those types of votes and how they must be cast. If they are not done in accordance with state law, for whatever reason, then they must be tossed out.

The media in Mississippi knows these facts, yet have remained silent or resorted to mockery and ridicule. Do you think they would have acted this way if a supporter of McDaniel had cast a questionable vote and it was NOT challenged?

Once again it is the media attempting to control the narrative with selective reporting, which is a major story within the story of the Mississippi Senate race.

Since the media seems incapable of reporting the real story, here are just a few questions for them to consider:

Why did Kirk Sims get replaced so soon after the runoff and the questions of fraud began to mount?

Where is Sims now? Where is Cochran? Where on Earth is Haley Barbour? And why has he or his illustrious nephew answered any questions about their shady race-baiting ads?

Where did the tens of thousands in cash money go that was paid to these people to “get out the vote”?

Perhaps if the media in Mississippi, as well as around the country, would ask the right questions of the right people and do some actual reporting, then this issue would have been solved long ago.

Advertisements

Comments

  1. Just because McDaniel’s examiners say a vote is irregular does not make it true. For instance if some little insignificant examiner says my signatures don’t match and I know I signed those documents myself, he is going to have to answer to me. That is an accusation of wrong doing, which I will challenge in court. He won’t disenfranchise me and get by with it.

  2. Sure thing. Nobody is arguing that slighly-mismatched signatures (which could be a result of awkward angles when signing at the polling-place) cannot be double-checked by testimony on the stand. If you really are named in the PDF as having a mismatched signature — I don’t see any Horace with that problem — then contact Mitch Tyner at his law firm, and ask to be called as a witness, or ask to file an affidavit stating that you were the person who signed in all cases.

    But of course, there are only about two dozen cases where the signature-mismatch was the problem, that I am aware of. The meat of the challenge is based on ~3500 illegal-double-votes, ~2300 invalid-absentee-ballots (including about a dozen sig-mismatch cases), and ~9300 other irregularities (many of them illegal-double-votes-retroactively-erased-by-pollworkers, plus another dozen or so sig-related-problems).

    The strategy of the Barbour lawyers from Butler Snow is to get as much evidence disqualified (on technical grounds) as they can, of course. That way, the provable amount of fraud will decrease, and maybe the judge will permit the runoff-results to stand rather than overturning them. Nobody on either team will object if you want to challenge a case of signature-mismatch, even though such one-by-one disqualifications of a couple dozen irregularities it won’t impact the final outcome of the lawsuit much. Justice for all, though, please contact Tyner.

  3. Where on earth is Melanie Sojourner? Where on earth is Michael Watson? Where on earth is Noel Fritsch? Are they still part of The Anointed One’s discipleship training team? Have they changed to another sect? Have they been dis-fellowshipped? It seems that they have pretty much disappeared from the public domain since Mitch Tyner came on to the scene.
    Pappy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: